One PSC, several entities
The individual controls several companies, LLPs or a mixture of both and must deal with each PSC role separately.


£40.00+VATIdentityGuard Pro™ Recommended for 1
package
Buy Now IdentityGuard Pro™ – Standard Verification for a Confirmed Individual PSC in a Multi-Entity or Overseas Matter for £40 + VAT. The fixed £40 + VAT price applies to one individual verification within the standard evidence scope. Each additional person requires their own assessment and, where applicable, separate purchase. The same individual normally verifies once, but must supply the Personal Code separately for each PSC or other applicable role. If one check requires priority handling, compare RapidVerify Pro™. Use the person-and-entity map before ordering. A standard route for one confirmed individual—not a group verification package. |
£65.00+VATRapidVerify Pro™ Recommended for 2
package
Buy Now RapidVerify Pro™ – Priority Verification for One Time-Sensitive Individual PSC for £65 + VAT. The fixed £65 + VAT price covers one priority ACSP verification. Additional individuals remain separate, and every company or LLP retains its own PSC information and filing responsibilities. If priority is unnecessary, compare IdentityGuard Pro™. The applicable dates must be mapped under separate PSC periods, and code reuse must be coordinated through the Personal Code and role-connection page. Priority for one confirmed person without presenting a group as one verification subject. |
£125.00+VATVerifyFlex Solutions™ Recommended for 3
package
Buy Now VerifyFlex Solutions™ – Flexible Verification for an Overseas PSC or Uncertain Document Compatibility for £125 + VAT. The fixed £125 + VAT price applies to the agreed assessment and supported verification of one individual. Translation, certification, courier work or another third-party process is not included unless expressly agreed. If the case requires the highest level of individual evidence handling, compare the FlexiVerify Option™. Before providing documents, review what information to provide. Flexible support for an overseas or non-standard evidence route without promising universal coverage. |
£220.00+VATFlexiVerify Option™ Recommended for 4
package
Buy Now FlexiVerify Option™ – Enhanced Individual Support for a Complex Overseas or Multi-Entity PSC Verification for £220 + VAT. The fixed £220 + VAT price covers enhanced work for one complex individual case. It does not guarantee document acceptance, Personal Code issue, completion of every entity’s PSC process or acceptance of a filing. If route flexibility is sufficient without the highest support level, compare VerifyFlex Solutions™. Where the real complexity concerns identifying the registrable person through a corporate or trust structure, use the indirect-control identification service before arranging verification. Enhanced evidence support for one person, with every entity and role kept distinct. |
The difficulty is often not the identity check alone. Different people may have different roles, evidence, verification routes and dates, while the same person may need to use one Personal Code through several separate processes.
The individual controls several companies, LLPs or a mixture of both and must deal with each PSC role separately.
Each individual needs their own identity-verification route, code and applicable PSC process.
The person may need a route suited to their location, supported documents, address evidence and personal details.
A PSC may also be a company director or LLP member, but each role has its own code-use process.
Coddan’s coordination starts with a separate record for every affected combination. Information can be shared operationally where appropriate, but legal and Companies House steps must not be merged.
Full name, date of birth, residence, contact details and identity evidence.
The particular company or LLP and its own PSC information and dates.
The underlying control condition and the separate PSC code connection.
Any directorship or LLP membership requiring its own process.
Free Companies House verification or supported ACSP verification, where suitable.
The person-specific period for providing PSC verification details.
The company’s or LLP’s separate notification, filing and record work.
What is supported, outstanding, inconsistent or route-dependent.
An individual normally completes identity verification once and retains one Companies House Personal Code. The same code can then be reused where required for relevant companies, LLPs and roles. Reuse of the code is not automatically another identity check or another paid verification service.
The reuse does not combine the roles. The individual must provide the code separately through every applicable PSC process, and separately again for an affected director or LLP-member role. Completing the requirement for one company does not connect the verified identity with another company or LLP.
One person → normally one Personal Code → separate use for every affected entity and role.
Each PSC is a separate individual. One person’s identity documents, completed check or Personal Code cannot be used for another person. The company or LLP may coordinate the overall work, but each PSC may use the verification route that is appropriate and available to them.
Evidence, liveness, personal details and the verification outcome belong to the individual concerned.
One PSC may use the free official route while another uses an ACSP. The identity standard is not reduced by the route selected.
Each PSC’s applicable period and code submission must be tracked independently from the entity’s own notification work.
Residence or nationality outside the UK does not remove a current individual PSC’s identity-verification requirement. PSC status still depends on the applicable ownership or control conditions, not where the individual lives, works or holds documents.
The free Companies House route may be available where the person and evidence meet its current requirements. GOV.UK currently lists a biometric passport from any country among the photo-ID options for online verification. Other routes and documents have their own conditions.
An ACSP route may be appropriate where confirmed. Document support depends on current provider coverage, document type, issuing country, quality and consistency. Coddan checks this before presenting the route as suitable.
Different spellings, transliteration, address formats or scripts may need comparison across the evidence, verification file and Companies House information. A difference should be examined rather than concealed.
Documentary caution: certification, translation, notarisation and an apostille are not universal identity-verification requirements. Where one of these steps is relevant, it serves a particular documentary purpose; it does not guarantee that Companies House, an ACSP or a provider will accept the underlying evidence.
Do not assume that a document is supported merely because it is official. Acceptance depends on the route, the document, its issuer, validity and the information it contains.
Type, issuing country, expiry, readability and current route support.
Current residential address, acceptable evidence, issue date and consistency.
Names, date of birth, address, email and telephone details must relate to the same individual.
The individual, entity and role must be matched without treating an inaccurate register entry as correct.
Every PSC has an applicable period for providing verification details, but the trigger depends on the person’s circumstances. A coordination schedule must therefore follow the individual and the relevant entity rather than impose one group deadline.
| Situation | Current timing orientation | What remains separate |
|---|---|---|
| Became a PSC after 18 November 2025 | The code may be provided when first added or within 14 days after being added. | The entity’s PSC notification and the individual’s code requirement. |
| Existing PSC who is also a director | The PSC period is linked to the company’s confirmation-statement date. | Director code use and PSC code use remain separate. |
| Existing PSC who is also an LLP member | The equivalent-role route is tied to the LLP’s applicable confirmation-statement timing. | LLP-member code use and PSC code use remain separate. |
| Existing PSC who holds neither office in that entity | The period falls in the first 14 days of the individual’s birth month. | Other entities may produce different dates for the same individual. |
This is an orientation, not the complete timing service. The individual’s live Companies House position and dates should be checked. An early confirmation statement must not be assumed to move an existing PSC’s period.
PSC status arises from ownership or control. Identity verification confirms the individual’s identity within the Companies House framework; it does not determine whether the person is a PSC or which nature of control applies.
Each company or LLP must separately identify, confirm and notify its own PSC information and retain or maintain the appropriate supporting records. One entity cannot complete another entity’s obligation merely because the same individual controls both.
A company-formation or registration application may involve several proposed PSCs, overseas controllers or one person connected with more than one new entity. Each proposed PSC must be identified correctly and their verification and Personal Code position coordinated with the application.
This page supplies person-centred verification support. The formation ecosystem retains responsibility for the complete incorporation application, company structure, constitutional information and registration outcome. Identity verification does not incorporate the company.
View Company Limited by Guarantee formationCoddan CPM Limited is registered with Companies House as an Authorised Corporate Service Provider and is supervised by HMRC for anti-money-laundering purposes. Where the supported route is suitable, authorised and agreed, the following verification work applies to each individual.
Coddan identifies the individual, entity and affected PSC role.
Coddan records the required name, date of birth, residential address, email address and telephone number.
The individual receives a secure link by email or text message from Coddan’s identity-verification provider.
The individual supplies supported identity and address evidence and completes the required selfie or liveness check.
Coddan reviews the result and any exceptional evidence rather than treating a technology result as the complete company event.
Where satisfactory and authorised, Coddan manually submits the required verification information through its Companies House ACSP account.
Companies House sends the Personal Code to the individual using the supplied email address.
The code is then used through each applicable PSC or other role process; entity filings remain separate.
Coddan’s client onboarding and anti-money-laundering checks remain distinct from Companies House identity verification. Coddan and its provider do not issue the Personal Code or guarantee Companies House acceptance.
An eligible individual may verify through the free official route. Professional ACSP support is optional, including for an overseas person where the official route and their evidence are suitable.
Several PSCs connected with the same entity can use different appropriate routes. A paid or priority Coddan service does not lower the identity standard, accelerate Companies House’s own decisions or guarantee acceptance.
Current-position wording checked against official guidance on 20 September 2026.
Current
Individual PSCs must verify and provide their code through the applicable PSC process. Overseas residence does not create an exemption, and every entity and role remains separate.
Transitional
Mandatory identity verification began on 18 November 2025. Existing PSCs follow the period determined by their own role, registration history and relevant entity dates—not one universal deadline.
Future
Requirements for officers of corporate PSCs and general filers must not be treated as current until they are commenced and supported by operational guidance.
Within the agreed scope, Coddan can create a person-and-entity schedule, identify appropriate verification routes, check apparent evidence and information differences, coordinate supported ACSP verification, identify separate Personal Code uses and direct the entity work to the appropriate company or LLP service.
Separate every person, company, LLP, PSC role and additional office.
Identify the free or supported route and whether the proposed evidence appears suitable.
Record each applicable PSC period and every separate role connection required.
Coordinate confirmed formation, notification or filing work only where authorised and separately agreed.
“Not known” is an acceptable answer. You do not need to determine the PSC status, timing route or documentary conclusion before Coddan reviews the position.
Registered name, number, jurisdiction, entity type and relevant confirmation-statement date.
Full name, date of birth, residential country, email, telephone number and affected roles.
When the person became registered or is proposed to be added, and any displayed PSC period.
Document type, issuing country, expiry, language or script and available address evidence.
Route used, result, whether a Personal Code was received and which roles have already been connected.
Name, birth date, address, email, register or control differences and any official message received.
This section does not transmit an enquiry. Use Coddan’s normal website contact details. Do not place an actual Personal Code, password, company authentication code or sensitive unredacted identity evidence in a general website enquiry.
Verification and coordination do not create or end PSC status, determine indirect control, complete another person’s requirement, connect every role automatically, complete an entity’s PSC notification, correct the register or guarantee acceptance of documents or filings.
Complex corporate, RLE, trust and firm arrangements require the specialist identification route. Detailed code timing and dual-role use, disputed status, historic inaccuracies and corrective work remain separate services.
Normally, no. Identity verification is personal and the same Personal Code is normally reused. You must still provide it separately for every applicable entity and role.
No. One submission connects the verified identity with the relevant PSC role. Each other company or LLP must be dealt with through its own applicable process.
No. Every individual completes their own identity-verification requirement. An authorised person may provide verification details on a PSC’s behalf, but the code and verified identity remain personal to that PSC.
Yes. One person may use the free official route and another a suitable ACSP route. Each route must meet the applicable identity standard.
Yes, where the person is an individual PSC subject to the current requirement. Overseas residence or nationality does not create an exemption.
Potentially. Eligibility depends on the person and evidence. The official online route currently supports a biometric passport from any country, alongside other specified documents and routes.
No. Support depends on the current route and provider coverage, document type, issuing country, validity, quality and consistency.
No. These steps are not universally required and do not make an unsupported or inconsistent document acceptable automatically.
Provide the relevant versions and supporting explanation. The difference should be reviewed against the verification file and Companies House information before submission.
No. The applicable period depends on each person’s role, registration history and the relevant entity’s dates. One group deadline should not be assumed.
No. The same code is provided separately for the director and PSC roles through their applicable processes.
No. LLP membership and PSC status are different capacities. The code must be used separately through each applicable role process.
Yes, within an agreed scope. Coddan can organise the people, entities, routes, evidence, periods and separate code uses, while each individual and entity retains its own responsibilities.
Tell Coddan which individuals, companies, LLPs, countries and roles are involved. We can identify the appropriate verification and coordination route without treating the group as one person or one Companies House event.
Discuss coordinated PSC verification