A corporate member
A company, LLP or other legal entity is or will become a member, and you need to separate its filing position from the position of the people behind it.

£40.00+VATIdentityGuard Pro™ Recommended for 1
package
Buy Now IdentityGuard Pro™ – Standard Verification for an Individual Identified Within an LLP Control Structure for £40 + VAT. The fixed £40 + VAT price covers standard verification for the confirmed individual; it does not include corporate-chain mapping, PSC determination or an LLP filing unless separately agreed. Before ordering, review the legal control-chain distinctions. If priority handling is needed for the confirmed person, compare RapidVerify Pro™. Where the correct capacity is still uncertain, use the LLP role-classification service. Verification begins with the right natural person—not simply the nearest corporate name. |
£65.00+VATRapidVerify Pro™ Recommended for 2
package
Buy Now RapidVerify Pro™ – Priority Verification for a Confirmed Individual in a Corporate or RLE Structure for £65 + VAT. The fixed £65 + VAT price covers priority ACSP work for the identified individual. It does not verify a corporate member or RLE, and it must not be used to sell an uncommenced corporate-officer requirement as though it were current. If urgency is absent, compare IdentityGuard Pro™. Coddan’s possible coordination work is explained under what Coddan can coordinate, while Personal Code use belongs to the role-connection service. Priority handling only after the registrable person and current duty are established. |
£125.00+VATVerifyFlex Solutions™ Recommended for 3
package
Buy Now VerifyFlex Solutions™ – Flexible Verification for an Identified Individual With Non-Standard Evidence for £125 + VAT. The fixed £125 + VAT price covers route assessment, document guidance and supported verification for the confirmed individual. Corporate records, agreements, control-chain analysis and entity filings are separate. If more intensive evidence support is needed, compare the FlexiVerify Option™. The documents and facts that may be needed for the structural review are listed under what information to provide; ordinary capacity distinctions remain with Who Must Verify for an LLP? Flexible identity work without confusing verification with control analysis. |
£220.00+VATFlexiVerify Option™ Recommended for 4
package
Buy Now FlexiVerify Option™ – Enhanced Verification Support for a Confirmed Individual With Complex Evidence for £220 + VAT. The fixed £220 + VAT price covers enhanced verification work for the natural person, not a corporate-chain investigation or legal opinion. If a flexible route is sufficient, compare VerifyFlex Solutions™. If Companies House or the LLP’s records identify the wrong person, RLE or control position, continue to LLP record differences and corrective routes before arranging another check. High-support verification for the right individual, with corporate and legal questions kept outside the package. |
LLP identity verification
If a company or another legal entity is an LLP member, the name at the top of the structure does not by itself show who must verify. Coddan can help trace the membership and control chain, identify the registrable result and separate the natural people with current identity-verification duties from corporate and officer requirements that have not yet commenced.
A corporate member, a registrable relevant legal entity and an individual PSC are not interchangeable. The structure must be examined before a reporting, verification or Personal Code step is selected.
This page is for an LLP whose membership or control cannot be understood by looking only at a list of natural-person members. We first establish the legal entities, the rights they hold and the people who may control the LLP.
A company, LLP or other legal entity is or will become a member, and you need to separate its filing position from the position of the people behind it.
One entity owns or controls another, possibly across several jurisdictions, and the first registrable person or legal entity is not obvious.
A natural person may influence or control the LLP without being an LLP member, or may hold rights through a legal entity, trust or firm.
You are unsure whether the legal entity, its officers, an individual member, an individual PSC or the person making a filing currently needs to verify.
The correct approach is to work through the LLP’s actual membership, rights and control arrangements. A director, shareholder or beneficial owner of a corporate member is not automatically an LLP member or an LLP PSC merely because of that connection.
The same structure may contain several different capacities. Each one has to be considered on its own facts.
| Capacity | Current identity-verification position | What must remain separate |
|---|---|---|
| Individual LLP member | Within the current framework. This includes an individual designated member in their capacity as a member. | Verification does not admit, designate or remove the member. |
| Corporate member | Companies House guidance places corporate LLP-member verification among requirements to be introduced later. | The entity’s membership and filing information remain current LLP matters; future verification must not be presented as operational. |
| Individual PSC | Within the current framework and subject to the applicable PSC verification and code process. | Identity verification does not determine whether a PSC condition is met. |
| Registrable relevant legal entity | The entity may be registrable under the PSC regime, but it is not an individual Personal Code holder. | RLE reporting and identity verification of natural people are different questions. |
| Officer of a corporate member or corporate PSC | No current requirement arises solely from that officer capacity; relevant corporate and officer requirements are announced for later introduction. | A separate current individual-member or individual-PSC role must still be checked. |
| Beneficial owner or controller | The label alone creates no automatic answer. The LLP PSC conditions and entity-chain rules must be applied. | Economic interest, membership, management office and PSC status are not interchangeable. |
| Person filing for the LLP | The general filer requirement remains future unless the individual separately has a current affected role. | Authority to file, identity verification and responsibility for the underlying information remain distinct. |
Do not verify the organisational chart. Companies House identity verification applies to people in affected individual capacities. The legal entities and control chain determine which capacities exist and what must be reported.
Who Must Verify for an LLP? Members, Designated Members, Corporate Members and PSCs
An LLP may have a company, another LLP or another qualifying legal person as a member. The entity’s admission, designation, cessation and registrable details are LLP matters, but the current identity-verification framework must not be applied to the entity as though it were a natural person.
The LLP must establish that the legal entity is or will be a member, the effective date, whether it is designated, and the information required for the relevant LLP process.
A Companies House Personal Code is issued to a verified individual. It is not issued to the corporate member and must not be invented or borrowed for the entity.
Shareholders, directors, members or officers of the corporate member are not automatically members or PSCs of the LLP. Their actual rights and other capacities must be checked.
Designation gives the corporate member additional LLP responsibilities. It does not turn the entity into an individual or make the future corporate-member identity-verification requirement current.
A registrable relevant legal entity, commonly shortened to RLE, is not simply any corporate member. Broadly, it is a legal entity that meets a PSC condition in relation to the LLP and satisfies the statutory conditions that make the entity itself registrable.
The entity must meet the applicable control and transparency conditions. Membership by itself does not settle the PSC-register result.
Its registrable particulars may need to be reported, but the entity does not complete a natural-person identity check or receive an individual Personal Code.
If a legal entity is not registrable, it may be necessary to look through it to another entity or natural person. The result depends on the actual chain and applicable law.
Layered, overseas, trust-connected or disputed structures may require a separate PSC or legal analysis. This page does not replace that work or guarantee a particular registrable result.
An individual may be a PSC because of rights or control, including through another entity, trust or firm. The LLP’s actual agreement and arrangements must be examined. The statutory conditions include the following.
Rights to more than 25% of the surplus assets on a winding up.
Holding, directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the voting rights.
The right to appoint or remove a majority of the people entitled to take part in the LLP’s management.
The right to exercise, or actual exercise of, significant influence or control over the LLP.
Significant influence or control over a trust or firm that would meet an earlier condition if it were an individual.
A designated member is not automatically a PSC.
Likewise, a person does not have to be an LLP member to be a PSC. Ordinary professional, employee or officer activity is not automatically significant influence or control, but the combined facts and any rights beyond an ordinary role may need separate examination.
These examples show why the structure must be examined. They are illustrations only; they do not decide the outcome for your LLP.
Example A
If the corporate member meets an LLP PSC condition and qualifies as an RLE, the entity may be the registrable result. Natural people must still be checked for any separate current individual-member or individual-PSC capacity.
Example B
The enquiry may need to continue through the legal-person chain to another registrable entity or natural person. Overseas status alone does not decide the result.
Example C
A shareholder or officer of the corporate member is not automatically an LLP member. They currently verify only if the facts establish a separate affected individual role, such as individual PSC.
Example D
A person may be an officer of a corporate member, an individual LLP member and an individual PSC. Current and future duties must be applied separately to each capacity.
Finding the correct member, RLE or PSC is not the same as completing the incorporation, appointment or change. The underlying event must exist, be properly supported and be reported through the applicable process.
The proposed members, designated members, PSCs or RLEs and their required particulars must be established. Current individual-member Personal Codes are part of the applicable incorporation process; entity reporting remains separate.
Admission, designation, cessation or a change in particulars must reflect a real LLP event and its effective date. Verification does not create or validate that event.
A new PSC or RLE, a cessation or a change in the nature of control requires its own factual analysis and applicable notification. A Personal Code does not create or end control.
Identity Verification Before and During LLP Incorporation
The following position was checked on 20 September 2026. The relevant date and capacity must be confirmed again before action is taken.
Current
Individual LLP members and individual PSCs are within the current mandatory identity-verification framework. Their role-specific Personal Code steps and dates remain separate.
The LLP must also meet current obligations concerning its members and PSC or RLE information.
Transitional
Mandatory identity verification began on 18 November 2025. Existing individual members and PSCs follow the applicable role and event timing.
18 November 2026 is not one universal deadline for every individual, LLP or capacity.
Future
Companies House states that requirements for corporate LLP members, officers of corporate PSCs and people who file will be introduced later.
These announced duties are not presented here as an available current process or Coddan service.
Companies House provides a Personal Code after a person successfully completes identity verification. The code belongs to that individual—not to the LLP, a corporate member, an RLE, Coddan or another agent.
Uses the Personal Code through the applicable member process for the relevant LLP event.
Provides the code through the applicable PSC process and within the person’s relevant period.
Normally keeps the same code but provides it separately through each role process. One use does not complete the other.
Does not receive an individual Personal Code. The entity’s registrable information must be handled through the appropriate LLP or PSC process.
Providing a Personal Code does not prove membership, create PSC status, validate the control analysis or complete an LLP filing automatically.
An eligible individual may verify through the free official Companies House service. Professional ACSP assistance is not compulsory.
A paid verification service is not the answer to every corporate-member or control question. Coddan should first establish whether the work concerns an individual who must verify, an entity that must be reported, a control analysis or an LLP filing.
Coddan CPM Limited is registered with Companies House as an Authorised Corporate Service Provider, also known as a Companies House authorised agent, and is supervised by HMRC for anti-money-laundering purposes. That status does not make Coddan Companies House or determine the legal control position.
Identify the LLP, members, legal entities, RLE question, individual controllers and every current or future capacity that may matter.
Separate individual members and individual PSCs who currently need to verify from entities and officers whose requirements remain future.
Where suitable and agreed, coordinate an individual’s supported route using Coddan’s secure identity-verification provider, review the result and submit through Coddan’s ACSP account when satisfied and authorised.
Coordinate separately agreed incorporation, member, PSC, confirmation-statement or post-formation work within Coddan’s confirmed operational scope.
Coddan does not issue Personal Codes, invent a missing control right, decide a disputed PSC position, make an LLP decision or guarantee Companies House acceptance.
Once a current affected individual has been identified and Coddan’s route is selected and confirmed, the verification work remains separate from the control analysis and LLP event.
The service follows the legal structure before it reaches a verification route.
01
Confirm the LLP, every member and the legal form and jurisdiction of each entity in the relevant chain.
02
Review the LLP agreement, asset, voting, management and other control rights and the effective dates.
03
Determine whether the relevant result is an individual PSC, an RLE, another statutory statement or a matter needing specialist analysis.
04
Identify current individual-member and individual-PSC duties while reserving uncommenced corporate-member, officer and filer requirements.
05
Use the free official route or an agreed ACSP route for each natural person who has a current requirement.
06
Use the correct code through each affected role process and complete the valid incorporation, appointment, change or reporting work separately.
Provide what is available. “Not known” is an acceptable answer. You do not need to decide who is an RLE or PSC before Coddan reviews the structure.
Registered or proposed name, company number where available, jurisdiction, status and relevant incorporation or change date.
Natural-person and corporate members, designated status, admission or cessation dates and current particulars.
Full legal name, legal form, registration number, governing law, registered office and place of registration where applicable.
Shareholders, members, parent entities and the direct and indirect links between them.
The LLP agreement and information about surplus assets, votes, management appointments, vetoes and other influence or control.
Individuals said to be members, officers, owners, controllers, settlors, trustees or beneficiaries and the reason they may be relevant.
Current PSC information, statutory statements, nature-of-control details, notices and any previous professional analysis.
Which natural people have verified, how they verified and whether a Personal Code has been received or can be accessed.
Any recent transaction, appointment, cessation, change of rights, disagreement, missing record or Companies House inconsistency.
Do not place a Personal Code, password, company authentication code or unredacted identity evidence in a general website enquiry.
This section does not transmit an enquiry. Use Coddan’s normal contact details so the appropriate secure route can be confirmed.
Identity verification and a structure review do not by themselves:
A separate formation, post-formation, PSC, company-secretarial, correction, tax, regulatory or legal service may be required. Complex or disputed chains may need advice from a solicitor or another appropriately qualified professional.
Provide accurate instructions, establish valid LLP events, preserve the agreement and supporting records, investigate PSCs and report required information.
Provides accurate personal information, completes their own verification step, protects the Personal Code and authorises appropriate code use.
Performs only the structure review, verification, preparation, filing or coordination work it is authorised and engaged to undertake.
Controls its verification services, Personal Codes, filing acceptance and the public register. It does not make every disputed legal or control decision.
May be required where ownership, control, governing law, authority, trust arrangements or the registrable result is complex or disputed.
The scope may depend on the number and type of members, the number of entity layers and jurisdictions, whether the entities are registrable, the LLP agreement and control rights, the quality of the ownership records, the number of affected individuals, whether verification is already complete, and whether incorporation, member, PSC, confirmation-statement, correction or legal work is separately required.
It may also depend on missing or inconsistent evidence, changes during the review, disputed control, Coddan’s professional charge, Value Added Tax, applicable official charges and separately agreed professional work. No processing time, registrable result or filing outcome is guaranteed.
Verification is not automatically the service you need. The free route remains available where suitable, a corporate entity does not buy an individual verification check, and reusing an individual’s existing Personal Code is not automatically a new verification service.
Use the destination that matches the actual decision. Corporate membership, PSC or RLE analysis, individual verification and the underlying LLP event remain separate.
Current Companies House guidance says identity verification for corporate LLP members will be introduced later. The entity’s current membership and reporting obligations still apply, and any natural person with a separate current affected role must be assessed in that capacity.
No current individual-style requirement arises merely because the corporate member is designated. Designation creates additional LLP responsibilities, while the corporate-member identity-verification requirement remains future.
It is a legal entity that meets a PSC condition in relation to the LLP and satisfies the statutory conditions making that entity registrable. Not every corporate member is automatically an RLE.
No. A Personal Code is issued to a verified natural person. The RLE’s required particulars are handled through the applicable PSC reporting process.
Not solely because of that office under the current LLP framework. Companies House lists relevant corporate and corporate-PSC officer requirements for later introduction. A person may still have a current duty if they are separately an individual LLP member or individual PSC.
No automatic conclusion should be made. The statutory conditions and legal-entity chain rules must be applied to the actual rights and arrangements. An RLE may be the registrable result in some structures.
Yes. Membership is not required if the individual otherwise satisfies a PSC condition, for example through significant influence or control. The facts must be assessed.
No. Designated-member status carries LLP responsibilities but does not itself establish a PSC condition. Rights and actual control must be considered separately.
Not merely because that label is used. The person’s direct and indirect rights, the entity chain and the LLP PSC conditions must be examined.
Its legal form, governing law, registration and position in the control chain must be established. Overseas status does not by itself make the entity an RLE, remove reporting duties or decide which natural person may be registrable.
The person normally verifies once and keeps the same Personal Code, but supplies it separately through the applicable member and PSC processes. One role step does not complete the other.
Yes. The free official Companies House route remains available where suitable. Using Coddan or another ACSP is not compulsory.
No. Verification establishes a person’s identity within the Companies House framework. It does not determine ownership, control, PSC status or whether a legal entity is registrable.
No assumption should be made. Incorporation, member Personal Code use, PSC reporting and the individual PSC code process are separate requirements and must be checked for each person and event.
It may be needed where the ownership or control chain is complex, overseas law matters, trust or firm arrangements are involved, records are missing, or membership, authority, ownership or control is disputed.
Start with the LLP agreement, member list, entity details, an ownership or control chart if one exists, voting and management rights, current PSC information and the relevant event dates. “Not known” is acceptable.
Tell Coddan about the LLP, its members, the legal entities in the chain and the rights that may create control. We can help separate current individual duties from entity reporting, future requirements and any specialist control analysis still needed.
Contact Coddan