A new person is taking a role
We establish the appointment or control event, verification position, Personal Code requirement and filing route.


£40.00+VATIdentityGuard Pro™ Recommended for 1
package
Buy Now IdentityGuard Pro™ – Standard identity verification for an affected CLG role for £40 + VAT. Coddan reviews the completed result and supporting evidence and, where satisfied and authorised to proceed, manually submits the required identity-verification information through its Companies House ACSP account. Companies House—not Coddan—issues the Personal Code to the individual. The £40 + VAT price is Coddan’s professional charge for the agreed standard verification service; an eligible individual may instead use the free official Companies House route. Verification and Personal Code use do not make or validate the appointment, create PSC status or complete the related filing. The company decision, filing and internal records remain separate, as explained under appointing a new director. If Coddan’s verification handling is time-sensitive, compare RapidVerify Pro™. |
£65.00+VATRapidVerify Pro™ Recommended for 2
package
Buy Now RapidVerify Pro™ – Priority identity verification for an affected CLG role for £65 + VAT. Where the supported route applies and no further enquiry is required, Coddan targets its review and ACSP submission within one business day. This is a |
£125.00+VATVerifyFlex Solutions™ Recommended for 3
package
Buy Now VerifyFlex Solutions™ – Flexible evidence and verification-route assessment for £125 + VAT. The £125 + VAT price covers the agreed assessment, document guidance and supported verification work within the confirmed evidence scope. Further documents may be required before Coddan can decide whether it is satisfied and authorised to submit the verification information. |
£220.00+VATFlexiVerify Option™ Recommended for 4
package
Buy Now FlexiVerify Option™ – Individually managed complex-evidence support for £220 + VAT. The £220 + VAT price reflects the enhanced individual work included within the agreed complex-evidence scope. If Coddan becomes satisfied that the applicable verification standard has been met and is authorised to proceed, it manually submits the required information through its ACSP account; Companies House separately controls issue of the Personal Code. This package does not correct the register, reconstruct missing authority, backdate an event, determine a disputed appointment or decide whether a person satisfies a PSC condition. Those matters may require a separate company decision, registrar process, correction or legal advice. Use the CLG identity-problems and corrective-routes service where the event, authority or registered information may be wrong, and review when a change does not require another verification purchase. If flexible evidence assessment is sufficient, compare VerifyFlex Solutions™. |
Use this service when a CLG is appointing or losing a director, changing a director’s details, adding or removing an individual PSC, or recording a genuine change in control.
We establish the appointment or control event, verification position, Personal Code requirement and filing route.
We distinguish a genuine cessation or new detail from an earlier filing that was inaccurate.
We compare the available company evidence with Companies House information and identify whether ordinary change work or a corrective route is needed.
Identify the event before choosing a filing. These situations have different evidence, timing and consequences.
A person becomes a director, individual PSC or both from the relevant effective date.
A person resigns, is removed, dies or otherwise ceases to hold a role.
The person remains in office, but current registrable information has genuinely changed.
A person becomes or ceases to be a PSC, or the nature of their control changes.
Earlier information was inaccurate, omitted, duplicated, unsupported or filed against the wrong person or company.
Correction is not the same as reporting a genuine new change. Coddan first establishes what happened and when.
A director appointment requires a real company decision and a properly prepared appointment. Identity verification supports the Companies House process but does not make the appointment.
The articles and applicable company decision determine whether and how the person is appointed.
Consent to act, eligibility and any disqualification question remain separate from proving identity.
The proposed director must satisfy the current identity-verification requirement and provide the Personal Code through the applicable appointment process.
Companies House controls filing acceptance. The company must retain the appropriate decision, consent and governance evidence.
Acceptance of a filing does not cure an appointment that was not properly authorised. A charitable-company director may also have a separate charity-trustee capacity.
Resignation, removal, death, disqualification and cessation under the articles are not interchangeable. The event, effective date and supporting evidence must be established before Companies House is notified.
The relevant notice, decision, provision, death evidence or other record depends on how the office ended.
The cessation must be reflected through the appropriate Companies House process and in the company’s relevant governance records.
The position may depend on the cessation date, filing date, current register and any outstanding transition or confirmation-statement requirement. There is no safe blanket rule for every departing director.
Identity verification does not create or prove a cessation. Filing a cessation does not make a defective removal valid, and a former director should not be assumed to retain authority to instruct the company.
A genuine new change must be distinguished from information that was already wrong when filed.
A new name, service address, residential address, nationality, country of residence or other registrable change must be reported through the process applying to that information.
That is a correction problem. A date of birth does not ordinarily change; an incorrectly registered date may require a specific correction before role connection can succeed.
Identity verification and use of a Personal Code do not update the person’s registered details or replace the required change or correction procedure.
PSC status comes from the applicable ownership or control conditions. Identity verification confirms the individual’s identity; it does not decide whether those conditions are met.
Establish when the person first met a PSC condition, confirm the required particulars and nature of control, notify Companies House and complete the applicable identity-verification and Personal Code steps.
Establish when and why the person stopped meeting every applicable PSC condition. Verification does not cause the cessation.
Where the person remains a PSC but their nature or level of control changes, the confirmed new position must be reported accurately.
Current Companies House guidance says PSC information changes must be reported within 14 days after the company confirms the change. A person becoming a PSC after 18 November 2025 may provide their Personal Code when first added or within 14 days after being added. These are related but separate requirements.
If the PSC has died: current Companies House guidance says identity verification is not required for that PSC and that the person should remain on the register until a grant of probate or letters of administration has been received. The wider estate and company position may still require separate work.
A change in one capacity does not automatically change the other.
Both role processes must be completed. The individual normally uses the same Personal Code separately for each role.
The directorship ends through its proper route. PSC status continues if the person still meets a control condition.
The control change does not end the directorship. The director role continues unless it is separately ended.
The events may have different effective dates, evidence, filings and timing. One filing must not be assumed to complete both.
Directorship, PSC status, membership, guarantor status and charity trusteeship must each be considered separately.
A person may cease as director but remain a member or guarantor, or cease as a member or guarantor while remaining a director.
A charitable-company director may also be a charity trustee. The company and charity appointment or cessation requirements remain separate.
A change in an ordinary member, guarantor or trustee capacity does not itself create the director identity-verification requirement. Separate governance, charity or company-secretarial work may be required.
Before a filing is selected, Coddan must establish what actually happened and what evidence supports the effective date.
Articles, board or member decisions, consent to act, resignation notice, correspondence, minutes, voting information, control instruments or other contemporaneous records may be relevant.
We do not invent a missing decision, backdate an appointment or resignation, manufacture consent or reconstruct an event as though an original record had always existed.
A missing, invalid or disputed event may require a new decision, ratification where legally available, correction, court procedure or professional advice.
Companies House records information delivered to it. The filing date and the effective date of the underlying event may be different.
Minutes, notices, consents, the register of members and other required, historic or voluntarily maintained governance records evidence the company’s own decisions and position.
A Companies House filing does not replace the company’s supporting evidence. Updating internal records does not automatically update Companies House. Both should describe the same real event accurately.
The confirmation statement is not a universal substitute for reporting changes when they occur. Director appointments, cessations and detail changes, and PSC changes, may require their own process before the next statement. An existing director’s Personal Code may be provided through the applicable confirmation statement, while an individual PSC’s code requirement remains separate.
Information checked against current Companies House guidance on 19 September 2026. Recheck the official guidance if the event or filing occurs later.
A new director must satisfy the current verification and code requirements. An individual who becomes a PSC must verify and provide the code through the applicable PSC process. Director and PSC changes must also be reported through the processes applying to those events.
Mandatory identity verification began on 18 November 2025. Existing directors and PSCs have role-specific timing. A change during the transition must be assessed by person, capacity, event and date; 18 November 2026 is not one universal deadline.
Later requirements announced for people who file, corporate directors and officers of corporate PSCs must not be treated as operational until brought into force.
An eligible individual may use the free official service. Professional ACSP assistance is not compulsory.
Review the free official routeWhere suitable and agreed, Coddan coordinates supported verification and may connect it with separately authorised appointment, PSC, confirmation-statement or company-secretarial work.
Coddan CPM Limited is registered with Companies House as an Authorised Corporate Service Provider, also known as a Companies House authorised agent, and is supervised by HMRC for anti-money-laundering purposes.
Coddan is not Companies House and does not make the company’s decision. Verification does not appoint or remove a director, create or end PSC status, or guarantee filing acceptance.
Coddan’s client onboarding and anti-money-laundering checks remain distinct from Companies House identity verification.
Provide what you know. “Not known” is an acceptable answer and helps Coddan identify what still needs to be established.
Registered name, company number, jurisdiction, full name, date of birth and every current or proposed capacity.
What is said to have happened, the proposed or actual effective date and whether the matter is an appointment, cessation, current change or correction.
Articles, governing document, board or member decisions, consent, resignation notice, death evidence, control information and related correspondence where available.
Current Companies House information, relevant minutes, notices, historic records, member information and any inconsistency already identified.
How verification was or will be completed, whether the code has been received, relevant confirmation-statement or PSC dates and any notice already received.
Any doubt about authority, consent, appointment, resignation, removal, control, disqualification or an earlier filing.
Do not place your Personal Code in a general website enquiry. Use Coddan’s normal contact details when you are ready to explain the change.
An ordinary change filing may be unsuitable where the event, authority or registered information is already disputed or inaccurate.
Identity verification does not repair an inaccurate register. Coddan may identify the apparent problem and appropriate next route without turning this service into an RP01, RP04, rectification, removal, restoration or court guide.
Its authorised decision-makers control valid appointments, removals, governance decisions, company evidence and instructions.
Provides accurate information, completes verification where required and gives consent or notices through the proper process.
Within the agreed scope, we review the event, coordinate supported verification and prepare or coordinate confirmed company work.
Companies House controls its register and filing acceptance. Courts, regulators and relevant professionals control their own decisions and advice.
Not every company change requires a separate paid identity-verification service. The free official route remains available where suitable, and Personal Code reuse is not automatically a new verification charge.
The event and peopleThe type of change, number of affected people and capacities held by each person.
Evidence and authorityWhether decisions, consent, notices, control evidence and company records are complete.
Verification and filingsWhether verification and the Personal Code are ready, the number of filings and any confirmation-statement work.
Problems and separate workInconsistencies, disputes, historic errors, Coddan’s professional charge and VAT, official charges and separately required governance, legal, charity, correction or restoration work.
A new director must satisfy the current identity-verification requirement and provide the Personal Code through the applicable appointment process. The company must still make a valid appointment.
No. The appointment depends on the company’s articles, authority, decision, consent and effective date. Verification confirms identity for the Companies House framework.
There is no safe universal answer. The position may depend on the effective cessation date, filing date, current register and any outstanding confirmation-statement or transition requirement.
First establish whether and when the office validly ended. A missing notification may require a cessation filing; an inaccurate, unauthorised or disputed record may require a corrective or legal route.
Do not treat this as an ordinary resignation. The authority, consent, filing and possible misuse of identity must be examined, and Companies House or legal action may be required.
Use the current process applying to the changed detail. Verification and Personal Code use do not themselves update the registered information.
That is normally a correction rather than a new personal-detail change. The appropriate Companies House correction process may be required before role connection can succeed.
A person becoming a PSC after 18 November 2025 may provide the Personal Code when first added to the register or within 14 days after being added. The PSC notification and identity step remain separate.
No. PSC status continues if the person still satisfies a control condition. The two capacities must be considered separately.
No. The directorship continues unless it ends through its own valid event and process.
Not where the change requires an earlier separate notification. The confirmation statement confirms information but is not a universal replacement for director or PSC change filings.
No. The company must preserve and update the supporting governance and other records applicable to the event. Internal work does not automatically update Companies House either.
Where operationally confirmed, properly authorised and included in the agreed scope, Coddan may coordinate supported verification with the appropriate company filing and record work.
Identity verification cannot decide the dispute. The documents, authority and facts must be reviewed, and Companies House, registrar, court or legal action may be required.
Provide the CLG, person, capacities, event, date, decisions, notices, available records, verification position and any dispute or inconsistency. “Not known” is acceptable.
The type and number of changes, available authority and evidence, verification readiness, filings, record work, inconsistencies and any separately required corrective or legal work all matter.
Tell us who changed role, what happened, when it took effect and what records are available. We can identify the verification, filing, company-record and corrective work that may follow.
Contact Coddan about the change