We use cookies on this website, you can read about cookies and GDPR Privacy Policy here
Coddan CPM Ltd. – Company Registration Agent in the UK

Follow the CLG identity-discrepancy journey from identifying the apparent problem through comparing records, determining the correct corrective route and completing the authorised next step.

Step 1
Identify the Difference
Step 2
Compare Relevant Records
Step 3
Establish What Happened
Step 4
Classify the Problem
Step 5
Select Corrective Route
Step 6
Complete Authorised Work
Companies Registry's e-Services Portal Identity Verification CLG ID Verification How to Fix Companies House Identity Errors & Officer Record Discrepancies

How to Fix Companies House Identity Errors & Officer Record Discrepancies


Start Your Business Today: Fast Formation Services to Meet All Compliance Standards

Ensure compliance with Companies House through rapid, secure ID verification for Directors and PSCs. Complete the process online with an authorized ACSP

treamline your compliance with Companies House using our simple, secure ID verification for Directors and PSCs, all completed online by an authorized ACSP
£40.00
+VAT

IdentityGuard Pro™

Recommended for

1
package

Buy Now IdentityGuard Pro™ – Standard identity verification where a new check is appropriate for £40 + VAT.

The IdentityGuard Pro™ package is suitable only where the initial diagnosis establishes that the actual problem is incomplete identity verification and the individual’s evidence appears suitable for Coddan’s standard supported verification route. Coddan confirms the person, CLG, affected role and apparent source of the problem before creating a new verification file. The individual receives a secure link, supplies a supported identity document and proof of their current residential address, and completes the required selfie or liveness check. Begin with identifying the problem before selecting a route. Do not purchase another verification package merely because a Personal Code will not connect or a Companies House record appears inaccurate.

Coddan reviews the completed result and supporting evidence and, where satisfied and authorised to proceed, manually submits the required identity-verification information through its Companies House ACSP account. Companies House—not Coddan—issues the Personal Code to the individual. The £40 + VAT price is Coddan’s professional charge for the agreed standard verification service; an eligible person may instead use the free official Companies House route. A successful check does not correct an inaccurate filing, connect every company role, validate an appointment or decide PSC status. If the problem concerns code access or role connection, first review Personal Codes and role connection. If a suitable new check is genuinely required urgently, compare RapidVerify Pro™. Best suited only to a diagnosed, straightforward verification problem.



£65.00
+VAT

RapidVerify Pro™

Recommended for

2
package

Buy Now RapidVerify Pro™ – Priority identity verification where a new check is appropriate for £65 + VAT.

The RapidVerify Pro™ package provides priority professional handling only after Coddan has established that a new or continued identity check is the appropriate response and that the individual’s evidence appears suitable for the supported route. Coddan confirms the person, role and diagnosed verification problem, creates the separate file and prioritises review once the required information and suitable evidence have been received. The distinction between an evidence problem and a code or filing problem is explained under the symptom does not identify the solution. Priority verification is not priority register correction, removal, rectification, restoration or legal review.

Where the supported route applies and no further enquiry is required, Coddan targets its review and ACSP submission within one business day. This is a Coddan handling target, not a guarantee that Companies House will issue the code, connect the role, alter the register or accept another filing within the same period. The £65 + VAT price covers the agreed priority verification work. Missing, inconsistent or unsupported evidence may require further information or another route and may affect timing. Repeating verification does not repair a wrong date of birth, inaccurate appointment, disputed cessation or incorrect PSC entry. If priority is unnecessary, compare IdentityGuard Pro™. A genuine later change should follow the director and PSC change service, while the distinction between later changes and earlier errors is explained on this page. Priority handling for the identity check only, after the correct route has been diagnosed.



£125.00
+VAT

VerifyFlex Solutions™

Recommended for

3
package

Buy Now VerifyFlex Solutions™ – Flexible evidence and verification-route assessment for £125 + VAT.

The VerifyFlex Solutions™ package is intended where the diagnosis indicates an identity-verification problem, but the person’s documents or circumstances require more assessment than a straightforward supported case. This may involve an unsupported or expired document, unsuitable proof of address, differences in names or addresses, another script, an unclear image or an earlier digital attempt that did not complete. Coddan considers the evidence and whether the supported provider process or another available Companies House-compliant ACSP route may be appropriate. Coddan undertakes a diagnosed route-and-evidence assessment; the individual is not asked to choose a lower identity standard. Review whether this is genuinely an identity-verification problem. The package is not selected merely because an earlier company filing contains an error.

The £125 + VAT price covers the agreed assessment, document guidance and supported verification work within the confirmed evidence scope. Further documents may be required before Coddan can decide whether it is satisfied and authorised to submit the verification information. Flexible evidence assessment does not mean that every document, applicant or unsuccessful attempt can be supported. Translation, certification, notarisation, an apostille or another attempt does not automatically make the evidence acceptable. A replacement or second filing is a separate matter: review why RP01 and RP04 routes are different. If the problem is a genuine current change rather than an evidence defect, use the director and PSC change service. Where the identity evidence itself needs more extensive individual handling, compare the FlexiVerify Option™. Additional evidence assessment without presenting verification as register correction.



£220.00
+VAT

FlexiVerify Option™

Recommended for

4
package

Buy Now FlexiVerify Option™ – Individually managed complex-evidence support for £220 + VAT.

The FlexiVerify Option™ is intended only where the diagnosed problem remains an identity-verification matter and the individual’s evidence requires Coddan’s highest-support review before a viable route can be confirmed. It may be relevant where the standard digital journey is unsuitable, an earlier attempt did not complete, several personal details are inconsistent, or identity and residential-address evidence requires individual consideration. Coddan first establishes whether a current verification route appears available and which further evidence may be relevant. Where appropriate, Coddan coordinates additional evidence through the supported process and reviews the individual file. Read what Coddan must establish before selecting the route. Enhanced identity support cannot decide disputed facts, create missing authority or turn a record problem into a verification problem.

The £220 + VAT price reflects the enhanced individual work included within the agreed complex-evidence scope. If Coddan becomes satisfied that the applicable verification standard has been met and is authorised to proceed, it manually submits the required information through its ACSP account; Companies House separately controls issue of the Personal Code. This package does not remove register material, rectify a disputed appointment, determine PSC status, restore a dissolved company, investigate suspected fraud or guarantee a Companies House or court decision. Those matters require the applicable official, restoration, corrective or legal route. Review when an ordinary correction is not enough and what to preserve where identity may have been misused. If flexible evidence assessment is sufficient, compare VerifyFlex Solutions™. Individual support for complex identity evidence only—not a higher-priced route to change the register.




Identity and company-record problems

CLG Identity Problems, Record Differences and Corrective Routes

A failed identity check, an unmatched Personal Code and an inaccurate Companies House record may look connected, but they are different problems. The right response depends on what happened, when it happened and what the available evidence shows.

Coddan can compare the identity, company and filing information, establish the apparent source of the difference and identify the verification, filing, registrar, restoration or professional route that may be appropriate.

When this service may help

This service is for a CLG that cannot safely solve the problem by repeating an identity check or filing an ordinary change without first understanding the record difference.

Verification or code problem

Identity evidence is not accepted, the Personal Code cannot be accessed or the verified identity will not connect to the intended role.

Company records do not agree

The filing history differs from minutes, notices, consents, membership information or other available governance evidence.

Authority or identity is questioned

An appointment, cessation, PSC position or filing is disputed, or a person believes that their details may have been used without permission.

Identify the problem before selecting a route

Similar symptoms can have different causes. Coddan first establishes what information, person, role, document or event is in question.

Identity verification

The evidence, personal details, liveness step or available verification route is incomplete, unsupported or inconsistent.

Personal Code or connection

The person has verified but cannot access or correctly use the code, or the details do not match the relevant role record.

Genuine new change

The earlier information was accurate, but a name, address, appointment or control position has since changed.

Earlier filing error

Information was inaccurate, incomplete, duplicated or delivered against the wrong person, role, document or company when filed.

Disputed event

The existence, date, authority or validity of an appointment, resignation, removal, PSC position or filing is disputed.

Internal-record difference

The company’s supporting decisions and records do not agree with the public register or filing history.

Dissolved company

The company’s status may affect who can act and whether the record can be addressed before, during or after restoration.

Possible identity misuse

A person believes their name, address, code or identity has been used without authority or connected with an unfamiliar role.

Identity verification does not repair an inaccurate register, authorise a disputed appointment, restore a dissolved company or decide ownership, membership, control or legal validity.

The symptom does not identify the solution

A Personal Code will not match

The code may have been entered incorrectly, linked to another person, used for the wrong role process or blocked by different personal details on the register.

A former director remains displayed

There may be an unfiled cessation, an inaccurate date, a rejected filing or a dispute about whether and when the office ended.

A PSC entry is unexpected

The position may reflect a genuine control condition, a filing error, disputed control or possible use of personal details without permission.

Is this an identity-verification problem?

An identity check may stop because a document is unsupported or expired, proof of address is unsuitable, personal details differ, another script is used, the image is unclear or the individual cannot complete the required selfie or liveness step.

Check the submitted information

Compare the individual’s name, date of birth, address, contact information and evidence before another submission is attempted.

Confirm the available route

The free Companies House route, an ACSP route or further evidence may be appropriate according to the person and current documents.

Do not assume repetition is the answer

Another document, translation, certification, apostille or repeated attempt does not automatically make the evidence acceptable.

Companies House identity verification and Coddan’s client onboarding or anti-money-laundering checks are related but distinct processes.

What if the Personal Code does not connect?

Companies House gives the Personal Code to the verified individual. It belongs to that person, not to the CLG, and it is not the company authentication code.

Access or security

The individual may need to locate the code through the relevant Companies House process or seek replacement if it has been compromised.

Personal-detail mismatch

A different name or date of birth may prevent connection. An inaccurate registered date of birth requires correction of the original filing, not another identity check alone.

Wrong person or role

The correct individual’s code must be used through the applicable director or PSC process. One role connection does not complete every other role.

Underlying filing problem

A missing, inaccurate or disputed appointment or PSC filing must be dealt with separately. The code cannot repair or validate it.

Do not place your Personal Code in a general website enquiry. Provide it only through the appropriate secure and authorised process.

A new change is not the same as an earlier error

A genuine new change

The previous information was accurate, but a name, address, appointment or control position later changed. The current-change process must be used, and the company’s supporting records may also need updating.

An earlier filing was inaccurate

The information was wrong, incomplete, duplicated or delivered against the wrong person, document or company when filed. The original document and defect must be examined before a corrective route is chosen.

Identity verification does not report a later change. A Personal Code does not replace a change filing, and a confirmation statement is not a universal substitute where an earlier notification is required.

Replacement and second-filing routes are different

Companies House correction procedures depend on the original document and the nature of the defect. Neither route is appropriate merely because information changed later.

RP01 replacement

RP01 is a replacement procedure for an eligible earlier document that did not meet the requirements for proper delivery or contained unnecessary material requiring replacement. The replacement document and filing details must match the correction being made.

RP04 second filing

RP04 is available only in very limited cases to correct a very minor inaccuracy or omission in an eligible document that was otherwise properly delivered. It is not a general replacement procedure.

The route must be confirmed first. Depending on the document and error, a replacement, second filing or another procedure may be relevant. Eligibility, submission, authentication, register treatment and any restoration interaction must be confirmed before work begins.

When an ordinary correction is not enough

A registrar, removal, rectification, protection, restoration or legal route may be required where the problem concerns authority, legal effect or disputed facts rather than a straightforward filing error.

Appointment or cessation disputed

The existence, effective date, consent or authority for the event may need evidence and professional assessment.

PSC position disputed

Verification does not decide whether a control condition is met or whether the recorded nature of control is correct.

Removal or protection sought

Material is removed or protected only through an available statutory or official process and subject to the applicable evidence and decision.

Companies House will not necessarily remove information merely because a company or individual disagrees with it. Coddan does not decide a disputed legal question through identity-verification work.

Companies House information and company records

The public register and the company’s own evidence perform different functions. Both should describe the real company position accurately, but changing one does not automatically change the other.

Companies House information

Companies House records information delivered to it. Filing acceptance does not necessarily determine whether every underlying company decision was valid.

The company’s evidence

Minutes, notices, consents, resolutions, membership information and other required, historic or voluntarily maintained records may evidence what occurred and who was authorised.

Correcting Companies House information does not reconstruct missing internal evidence. Updating internal records does not automatically update the public register.

Possible misuse of identity

If you believe your name, address or identity has been connected with a company or role without permission, preserve the relevant Companies House notices, messages, verification communications, filing-history entries, dates and company details.

Companies House provides an official reporting route for personal details used without permission and may request further evidence. Depending on the circumstances, the matter may also require the company, an involved ACSP, a registrar procedure, an official fraud-reporting route or legal advice.

An unexpected record does not by itself prove fraud or dishonesty. Coddan will use reserved language until the available evidence establishes what occurred.

What if the CLG has been dissolved?

Dissolution may affect who can act and when a filing or correction can be made. Administrative restoration and restoration by court order have different conditions and should not be treated as one route.

Establish company status

Confirm the dissolution date, reason, historic filing position and whether restoration is being considered or is already under way.

Establish authority

A former officer should not be assumed to retain authority merely because their name appears in the historic register.

Confirm the timing of correction

It must be established whether the work can occur before, with or only after the applicable restoration process.

Not every correction requires restoration, and not every corrective procedure is available for a dissolved company. The position must be confirmed for the document and circumstances.

Current, transitional and later requirements

Current position

Directors and individual PSCs are within the current identity-verification framework. Personal Codes must be used through the applicable role process, while director and PSC changes and corrections remain separate work.

Transition and individual dates

Mandatory identity verification began on 18 November 2025. Existing directors and PSCs have role-specific timing. The relevant appointment, filing, confirmation-statement and PSC dates must be checked; 18 November 2026 is not one universal deadline.

Later requirements

Later requirements for people filing on behalf of companies, corporate directors and officers of corporate PSCs must not be treated as current until officially commenced and operational.

Official position checked: 19 September 2026.

Choose how to deal with identity verification

Free Companies House route

An eligible person may use the free official service. Professional ACSP assistance is not compulsory.

Review the free official route

Coddan’s supported ACSP route

Where agreed and suitable, Coddan may coordinate supported verification and review an apparent mismatch. This does not itself correct the company filing or register.

Coddan’s supported verification role

Coddan CPM Limited is registered with Companies House as an Authorised Corporate Service Provider, also known as a Companies House authorised agent, and is supervised by HMRC for anti-money-laundering purposes.

  1. 1. Identify the person and roleWe establish the individual, CLG, affected capacity and apparent verification or record problem.
  2. 2. Create the verification fileWhere a new supported check is appropriate, Coddan records the required name, date of birth, residential address, email address and telephone number.
  3. 3. Complete the secure checkThe individual receives a secure link, supplies supported identity and address evidence and completes the required selfie or liveness step.
  4. 4. Review the resultCoddan reviews the outcome, exceptional evidence and any mismatch or apparent information error.
  5. 5. Submit where authorisedWhere satisfactory and authorised, Coddan manually submits the required verification information through its Companies House ACSP account.
  6. 6. Separate the remaining workCompanies House sends the Personal Code to the individual. Code use, company filings and any corrective or legal work remain separate.

Coddan is not Companies House and does not issue Personal Codes, decide a disputed appointment or PSC position, remove register information or guarantee acceptance.

What Coddan must establish

Company and status

The CLG, company number, jurisdiction, current status, relevant filing and any restoration process.

Person and capacities

Whether the individual is a director, PSC, member or guarantor, charity trustee or holds several distinct capacities.

Event and authority

What happened, when it took effect, whether it was authorised and whether the affected person consented or disputes it.

Verification and records

How verification and code use occurred, what Companies House shows and what the supporting company evidence establishes.

A director, PSC, member or guarantor and charity trustee are separate capacities. Verification follows the affected Companies House role and does not alter another capacity.

How Coddan identifies the appropriate route

  1. Identify the differenceEstablish the person, company, role, document and information in question.
  2. Compare the recordsReview Companies House information, verification details and the company’s supporting evidence.
  3. Establish what happenedDistinguish a genuine new event from an earlier error, disputed event or possible identity misuse.
  4. Classify the problemSeparate verification, code connection, filing accuracy, authority, company records and dissolution.
  5. Select the routeIdentify the verified current filing, replacement, second filing, registrar, restoration, professional or legal route.
  6. Complete authorised workUndertake the agreed work, preserve the evidence and identify continuing obligations.

What information should you provide?

Provide what you know and the records already available. “Not known” is an acceptable answer; you do not need to select a correction form or reach a legal conclusion first.

The CLG and filing

Company name and number, jurisdiction, active or dissolved status, filing-history entry, original document and any restoration or corrective process already started.

The person and roles

Full name, date of birth, each relevant capacity and the information you believe is incorrect or belongs to another person.

The event and evidence

What is said to have occurred, the date, appointments, consents, resignations, notices, minutes, resolutions, correspondence, membership or control evidence.

Verification and messages

How verification was attempted, whether a code was received, and any Companies House or ACSP message, mismatch or earlier correction attempt.

Protect sensitive information. Do not place a Personal Code, password, company authentication code, unredacted residential-address document or sensitive identity evidence in a general website enquiry. Use Coddan’s normal contact details to explain the problem first.

What Coddan may provide

Depending on the problem and the service you instruct Coddan to provide, we may:

  • Identify the company, person, capacities, apparent problem and relevant dates.
  • Compare Companies House information with the supplied company and verification records.
  • Coordinate supported verification and review an apparent identity or Personal Code mismatch.
  • Distinguish a genuine new event from an earlier filing inaccuracy or disputed event.
  • Prepare or coordinate a confirmed filing where Coddan is authorised and able to proceed.
  • Identify when Companies House, restoration, governance, corrective or legal work is required.

Coddan does not invent authority, manufacture contemporaneous evidence, backdate an event, rewrite the filing history, remove register information or decide a matter controlled by Companies House, a court or another authority.

What this service does not do

Identity verification, a Personal Code and Coddan’s review do not appoint or remove a director, create or end membership, guarantor or PSC status, prove authority, validate a company decision, correct a filing automatically, remove an original document, reconstruct missing evidence or restore a dissolved company.

They also do not resolve a disputed legal question, complete charity-regulator work, establish trustee eligibility or guarantee a Companies House, registrar or court decision. Those matters require the appropriate separate route.

Who is responsible for each stage?

The company

Its authorised decision-makers are responsible for valid decisions, accurate instructions, supporting records and authority to act.

The individual

The affected person completes their personal verification step, protects the Personal Code and provides accurate information.

Coddan

Coddan controls only the review, verification, preparation, filing or coordination work it is authorised and engaged to perform.

Companies House

Companies House controls its verification services, Personal Codes, filing acceptance, register, registrar procedures and official decisions.

Courts and authorities

A court or other authority controls rectification, restoration, criminal, regulatory or related matters within its jurisdiction.

Professional advisers

Legal or other specialist advice may be needed where authority, appointment, control, validity, identity misuse or rectification is disputed.

What affects the work, cost and timing?

Not every mismatch requires another paid verification service, and repeating verification is not automatically the correct solution.

People, roles and filingsThe number of affected people, capacities, companies, documents and filings.

Evidence and agreementThe quality of the evidence, whether the parties agree and whether authority or control is disputed.

Company status and routeWhether the CLG is active or dissolved and whether verification, filing, registrar, restoration or court work is required.

Separate chargesCoddan’s professional charge, Value Added Tax, applicable official or court charges and separately agreed legal or governance work.

The free Companies House verification route remains available where suitable. Corrective, governance, restoration or legal work is included only where expressly agreed.

Frequently asked questions

Will repeating identity verification correct the Companies House register?

No. Another verification attempt may address an identity-check problem, but an inaccurate filing or registered detail requires the procedure applying to that information.

Why will my Personal Code not connect to my CLG role?

The code, person, date of birth, role process or underlying company record may not match. The source of the difference should be established before anything is resubmitted.

What if the registered date of birth is wrong?

Current Companies House guidance requires correction of the original filing containing the wrong date of birth. Verification alone does not amend it.

What if Companies House shows a director who says they were never appointed?

The filing, consent, company decision and contemporaneous evidence must be examined. This may require an official reporting, registrar, corrective or legal route rather than an ordinary cessation filing.

What if a former director is still shown as current?

First establish whether and when the office validly ended. The answer may be an unfiled cessation, a correction of inaccurate information or a disputed-event route.

Is a genuine new change the same as correcting an earlier filing?

No. A new change follows the current-change process. A historic inaccuracy requires examination of the original filing and the correction route available for it.

Can the confirmation statement correct every problem?

No. Director and PSC changes or inaccurate earlier filings may require their own notification or corrective process.

Does successful identity verification prove that someone is a PSC?

No. PSC status depends on the applicable ownership and control conditions. Verification confirms identity within the Companies House framework.

Can a Personal Code correct an appointment or PSC filing?

No. Code use connects a verified identity through the applicable role process; it does not repair or validate the underlying filing.

What should I do if my identity may have been used without permission?

Preserve the relevant notices, messages, filing information and dates. Companies House has an official reporting route and may request supporting evidence. Other official or legal action may also be appropriate.

Is RP01 or RP04 the correct route?

That depends on the original document and defect. RP01 is a replacement route; RP04 is restricted to very minor errors in eligible documents that were otherwise properly delivered.

Can RP04 be used for every Companies House document?

No universal eligibility should be assumed. The document, error and current Companies House procedure must be checked before an RP04 second filing is prepared.

Can Companies House remove the original document?

Material can be removed only where an available statutory or official procedure permits it and Companies House or a court makes the required decision. A correction request does not guarantee removal.

Can Coddan correct the register?

Coddan may review, prepare or coordinate confirmed work within the agreed scope. Companies House controls the register and acceptance of filings and applications.

What if the CLG has been dissolved?

The dissolution date, restoration route, authority to act and correction timing must be established. Not every correction can be treated in the same way before restoration.

When is legal or court action required?

It may be required where authority, appointment, ownership, control, legal effect, rectification or restoration is disputed or falls outside an available administrative route.

What information should I provide?

Provide the company, person, role, filing, event, relevant dates and available supporting records. “Not known” is acceptable. Do not place sensitive codes or identity documents in a general enquiry.

What affects the work, cost and timing?

The problem, people, roles, filings, evidence, agreement between the parties, company status and need for registrar, restoration, court or legal work all matter.

Start with the record difference, not a guessed form

Tell Coddan which CLG, person, role and filing are involved and what appears to be wrong. We can identify the evidence and route that must be considered before any verification, filing or corrective work begins.

Contact Coddan