Verification or code problem
Identity evidence is not accepted, the Personal Code cannot be accessed or the verified identity will not connect to the intended role.


£40.00+VATIdentityGuard Pro™ Recommended for 1
package
Buy Now IdentityGuard Pro™ – Standard identity verification where a new check is appropriate for £40 + VAT. Coddan reviews the completed result and supporting evidence and, where satisfied and authorised to proceed, manually submits the required identity-verification information through its Companies House ACSP account. Companies House—not Coddan—issues the Personal Code to the individual. The £40 + VAT price is Coddan’s professional charge for the agreed standard verification service; an eligible person may instead use the free official Companies House route. A successful check does not correct an inaccurate filing, connect every company role, validate an appointment or decide PSC status. If the problem concerns code access or role connection, first review Personal Codes and role connection. If a suitable new check is genuinely required urgently, compare RapidVerify Pro™. |
£65.00+VATRapidVerify Pro™ Recommended for 2
package
Buy Now RapidVerify Pro™ – Priority identity verification where a new check is appropriate for £65 + VAT. Where the supported route applies and no further enquiry is required, Coddan targets its review and ACSP submission within one business day. This is a |
£125.00+VATVerifyFlex Solutions™ Recommended for 3
package
Buy Now VerifyFlex Solutions™ – Flexible evidence and verification-route assessment for £125 + VAT. The £125 + VAT price covers the agreed assessment, document guidance and supported verification work within the confirmed evidence scope. Further documents may be required before Coddan can decide whether it is satisfied and authorised to submit the verification information. |
£220.00+VATFlexiVerify Option™ Recommended for 4
package
Buy Now FlexiVerify Option™ – Individually managed complex-evidence support for £220 + VAT. The £220 + VAT price reflects the enhanced individual work included within the agreed complex-evidence scope. If Coddan becomes satisfied that the applicable verification standard has been met and is authorised to proceed, it manually submits the required information through its ACSP account; Companies House separately controls issue of the Personal Code. This package does not remove register material, rectify a disputed appointment, determine PSC status, restore a dissolved company, investigate suspected fraud or guarantee a Companies House or court decision. Those matters require the applicable official, restoration, corrective or legal route. Review when an ordinary correction is not enough and what to preserve where identity may have been misused. If flexible evidence assessment is sufficient, compare VerifyFlex Solutions™. |
This service is for a CLG that cannot safely solve the problem by repeating an identity check or filing an ordinary change without first understanding the record difference.
Identity evidence is not accepted, the Personal Code cannot be accessed or the verified identity will not connect to the intended role.
The filing history differs from minutes, notices, consents, membership information or other available governance evidence.
An appointment, cessation, PSC position or filing is disputed, or a person believes that their details may have been used without permission.
Similar symptoms can have different causes. Coddan first establishes what information, person, role, document or event is in question.
The evidence, personal details, liveness step or available verification route is incomplete, unsupported or inconsistent.
The person has verified but cannot access or correctly use the code, or the details do not match the relevant role record.
The earlier information was accurate, but a name, address, appointment or control position has since changed.
Information was inaccurate, incomplete, duplicated or delivered against the wrong person, role, document or company when filed.
The existence, date, authority or validity of an appointment, resignation, removal, PSC position or filing is disputed.
The company’s supporting decisions and records do not agree with the public register or filing history.
The company’s status may affect who can act and whether the record can be addressed before, during or after restoration.
A person believes their name, address, code or identity has been used without authority or connected with an unfamiliar role.
Identity verification does not repair an inaccurate register, authorise a disputed appointment, restore a dissolved company or decide ownership, membership, control or legal validity.
The code may have been entered incorrectly, linked to another person, used for the wrong role process or blocked by different personal details on the register.
There may be an unfiled cessation, an inaccurate date, a rejected filing or a dispute about whether and when the office ended.
The position may reflect a genuine control condition, a filing error, disputed control or possible use of personal details without permission.
An identity check may stop because a document is unsupported or expired, proof of address is unsuitable, personal details differ, another script is used, the image is unclear or the individual cannot complete the required selfie or liveness step.
Compare the individual’s name, date of birth, address, contact information and evidence before another submission is attempted.
The free Companies House route, an ACSP route or further evidence may be appropriate according to the person and current documents.
Another document, translation, certification, apostille or repeated attempt does not automatically make the evidence acceptable.
Companies House identity verification and Coddan’s client onboarding or anti-money-laundering checks are related but distinct processes.
Companies House gives the Personal Code to the verified individual. It belongs to that person, not to the CLG, and it is not the company authentication code.
The individual may need to locate the code through the relevant Companies House process or seek replacement if it has been compromised.
A different name or date of birth may prevent connection. An inaccurate registered date of birth requires correction of the original filing, not another identity check alone.
The correct individual’s code must be used through the applicable director or PSC process. One role connection does not complete every other role.
A missing, inaccurate or disputed appointment or PSC filing must be dealt with separately. The code cannot repair or validate it.
Do not place your Personal Code in a general website enquiry. Provide it only through the appropriate secure and authorised process.
The previous information was accurate, but a name, address, appointment or control position later changed. The current-change process must be used, and the company’s supporting records may also need updating.
The information was wrong, incomplete, duplicated or delivered against the wrong person, document or company when filed. The original document and defect must be examined before a corrective route is chosen.
Identity verification does not report a later change. A Personal Code does not replace a change filing, and a confirmation statement is not a universal substitute where an earlier notification is required.
Companies House correction procedures depend on the original document and the nature of the defect. Neither route is appropriate merely because information changed later.
RP01 is a replacement procedure for an eligible earlier document that did not meet the requirements for proper delivery or contained unnecessary material requiring replacement. The replacement document and filing details must match the correction being made.
RP04 is available only in very limited cases to correct a very minor inaccuracy or omission in an eligible document that was otherwise properly delivered. It is not a general replacement procedure.
The route must be confirmed first. Depending on the document and error, a replacement, second filing or another procedure may be relevant. Eligibility, submission, authentication, register treatment and any restoration interaction must be confirmed before work begins.
A registrar, removal, rectification, protection, restoration or legal route may be required where the problem concerns authority, legal effect or disputed facts rather than a straightforward filing error.
The existence, effective date, consent or authority for the event may need evidence and professional assessment.
Verification does not decide whether a control condition is met or whether the recorded nature of control is correct.
Material is removed or protected only through an available statutory or official process and subject to the applicable evidence and decision.
Companies House will not necessarily remove information merely because a company or individual disagrees with it. Coddan does not decide a disputed legal question through identity-verification work.
The public register and the company’s own evidence perform different functions. Both should describe the real company position accurately, but changing one does not automatically change the other.
Companies House records information delivered to it. Filing acceptance does not necessarily determine whether every underlying company decision was valid.
Minutes, notices, consents, resolutions, membership information and other required, historic or voluntarily maintained records may evidence what occurred and who was authorised.
Correcting Companies House information does not reconstruct missing internal evidence. Updating internal records does not automatically update the public register.
If you believe your name, address or identity has been connected with a company or role without permission, preserve the relevant Companies House notices, messages, verification communications, filing-history entries, dates and company details.
Companies House provides an official reporting route for personal details used without permission and may request further evidence. Depending on the circumstances, the matter may also require the company, an involved ACSP, a registrar procedure, an official fraud-reporting route or legal advice.
An unexpected record does not by itself prove fraud or dishonesty. Coddan will use reserved language until the available evidence establishes what occurred.
Dissolution may affect who can act and when a filing or correction can be made. Administrative restoration and restoration by court order have different conditions and should not be treated as one route.
Confirm the dissolution date, reason, historic filing position and whether restoration is being considered or is already under way.
A former officer should not be assumed to retain authority merely because their name appears in the historic register.
It must be established whether the work can occur before, with or only after the applicable restoration process.
Not every correction requires restoration, and not every corrective procedure is available for a dissolved company. The position must be confirmed for the document and circumstances.
Directors and individual PSCs are within the current identity-verification framework. Personal Codes must be used through the applicable role process, while director and PSC changes and corrections remain separate work.
Mandatory identity verification began on 18 November 2025. Existing directors and PSCs have role-specific timing. The relevant appointment, filing, confirmation-statement and PSC dates must be checked; 18 November 2026 is not one universal deadline.
Later requirements for people filing on behalf of companies, corporate directors and officers of corporate PSCs must not be treated as current until officially commenced and operational.
Official position checked: 19 September 2026.
An eligible person may use the free official service. Professional ACSP assistance is not compulsory.
Where agreed and suitable, Coddan may coordinate supported verification and review an apparent mismatch. This does not itself correct the company filing or register.
Coddan CPM Limited is registered with Companies House as an Authorised Corporate Service Provider, also known as a Companies House authorised agent, and is supervised by HMRC for anti-money-laundering purposes.
Coddan is not Companies House and does not issue Personal Codes, decide a disputed appointment or PSC position, remove register information or guarantee acceptance.
The CLG, company number, jurisdiction, current status, relevant filing and any restoration process.
Whether the individual is a director, PSC, member or guarantor, charity trustee or holds several distinct capacities.
What happened, when it took effect, whether it was authorised and whether the affected person consented or disputes it.
How verification and code use occurred, what Companies House shows and what the supporting company evidence establishes.
A director, PSC, member or guarantor and charity trustee are separate capacities. Verification follows the affected Companies House role and does not alter another capacity.
Provide what you know and the records already available. “Not known” is an acceptable answer; you do not need to select a correction form or reach a legal conclusion first.
Company name and number, jurisdiction, active or dissolved status, filing-history entry, original document and any restoration or corrective process already started.
Full name, date of birth, each relevant capacity and the information you believe is incorrect or belongs to another person.
What is said to have occurred, the date, appointments, consents, resignations, notices, minutes, resolutions, correspondence, membership or control evidence.
How verification was attempted, whether a code was received, and any Companies House or ACSP message, mismatch or earlier correction attempt.
Protect sensitive information. Do not place a Personal Code, password, company authentication code, unredacted residential-address document or sensitive identity evidence in a general website enquiry. Use Coddan’s normal contact details to explain the problem first.
Depending on the problem and the service you instruct Coddan to provide, we may:
Coddan does not invent authority, manufacture contemporaneous evidence, backdate an event, rewrite the filing history, remove register information or decide a matter controlled by Companies House, a court or another authority.
Identity verification, a Personal Code and Coddan’s review do not appoint or remove a director, create or end membership, guarantor or PSC status, prove authority, validate a company decision, correct a filing automatically, remove an original document, reconstruct missing evidence or restore a dissolved company.
They also do not resolve a disputed legal question, complete charity-regulator work, establish trustee eligibility or guarantee a Companies House, registrar or court decision. Those matters require the appropriate separate route.
Its authorised decision-makers are responsible for valid decisions, accurate instructions, supporting records and authority to act.
The affected person completes their personal verification step, protects the Personal Code and provides accurate information.
Coddan controls only the review, verification, preparation, filing or coordination work it is authorised and engaged to perform.
Companies House controls its verification services, Personal Codes, filing acceptance, register, registrar procedures and official decisions.
A court or other authority controls rectification, restoration, criminal, regulatory or related matters within its jurisdiction.
Legal or other specialist advice may be needed where authority, appointment, control, validity, identity misuse or rectification is disputed.
Not every mismatch requires another paid verification service, and repeating verification is not automatically the correct solution.
People, roles and filingsThe number of affected people, capacities, companies, documents and filings.
Evidence and agreementThe quality of the evidence, whether the parties agree and whether authority or control is disputed.
Company status and routeWhether the CLG is active or dissolved and whether verification, filing, registrar, restoration or court work is required.
Separate chargesCoddan’s professional charge, Value Added Tax, applicable official or court charges and separately agreed legal or governance work.
The free Companies House verification route remains available where suitable. Corrective, governance, restoration or legal work is included only where expressly agreed.
No. Another verification attempt may address an identity-check problem, but an inaccurate filing or registered detail requires the procedure applying to that information.
The code, person, date of birth, role process or underlying company record may not match. The source of the difference should be established before anything is resubmitted.
Current Companies House guidance requires correction of the original filing containing the wrong date of birth. Verification alone does not amend it.
The filing, consent, company decision and contemporaneous evidence must be examined. This may require an official reporting, registrar, corrective or legal route rather than an ordinary cessation filing.
First establish whether and when the office validly ended. The answer may be an unfiled cessation, a correction of inaccurate information or a disputed-event route.
No. A new change follows the current-change process. A historic inaccuracy requires examination of the original filing and the correction route available for it.
No. Director and PSC changes or inaccurate earlier filings may require their own notification or corrective process.
No. PSC status depends on the applicable ownership and control conditions. Verification confirms identity within the Companies House framework.
No. Code use connects a verified identity through the applicable role process; it does not repair or validate the underlying filing.
Preserve the relevant notices, messages, filing information and dates. Companies House has an official reporting route and may request supporting evidence. Other official or legal action may also be appropriate.
That depends on the original document and defect. RP01 is a replacement route; RP04 is restricted to very minor errors in eligible documents that were otherwise properly delivered.
No universal eligibility should be assumed. The document, error and current Companies House procedure must be checked before an RP04 second filing is prepared.
Material can be removed only where an available statutory or official procedure permits it and Companies House or a court makes the required decision. A correction request does not guarantee removal.
Coddan may review, prepare or coordinate confirmed work within the agreed scope. Companies House controls the register and acceptance of filings and applications.
The dissolution date, restoration route, authority to act and correction timing must be established. Not every correction can be treated in the same way before restoration.
It may be required where authority, appointment, ownership, control, legal effect, rectification or restoration is disputed or falls outside an available administrative route.
Provide the company, person, role, filing, event, relevant dates and available supporting records. “Not known” is acceptable. Do not place sensitive codes or identity documents in a general enquiry.
The problem, people, roles, filings, evidence, agreement between the parties, company status and need for registrar, restoration, court or legal work all matter.
Tell Coddan which CLG, person, role and filing are involved and what appears to be wrong. We can identify the evidence and route that must be considered before any verification, filing or corrective work begins.
Contact Coddan