9.30 am – 6.00 pm GMT
Monday-Friday
info@coddan.co.uk
An incorporated charitable organisation starts with the organisation itself.
Before deciding what legal form, governing document or registration route should be used, it is important to understand what you are actually trying to establish.
What will this organisation exist to achieve? What need, community, group of people or wider public interest is it intended to address? What do you expect it to become once it is established?
You may already have a name in mind. You may have people ready to become trustees. You may already be using terms such as "CIO", "SCIO" or "charity". You may simply know that you want to create an organisation with a charitable purpose and an incorporated legal identity.
You do not need to arrive with the legal structure already worked out.
The starting point is the organisation: its intended purpose, the people it is intended to benefit, what it will do, who will govern it and the circumstances in which it will operate.
Those facts provide the foundation for determining how the organisation should be established.
Once the organisation is clear, Coddan can help you work through the practical formation arrangements. Explore Coddan's CLG formation-agent services for suitable company documents, human review and agreed incorporation work, or consider the appropriate route if your organisation may instead require a different incorporated structure.
£349.99+VATCIOReg Essential™ Recommended for 1
package
Buy Now
Essential
CIO Registration Support — £349.99 + VAT · Straightforward CIO establishment and registration support Flexible CIO Establishment & Registration Support |
£449.99+VATCIOReg Office™ Recommended for 2
package
Buy Now
Office
CIO Registration + Professional Office — £449.99 + VAT · CIO establishment, registration support and professional office arrangement CIO Establishment, Professional Registration Support & Office Arrangement |
£649.99+VATCIOReg Pro™ Recommended for 3
package
Buy Now
Professional
Comprehensive CIO Establishment & Registration Support — £649.99 + VAT · Comprehensive CIO preparation, registration support and administration Comprehensive CIO Establishment & Professional Registration Support |
£895.00+VATCIOReg Complete™ Recommended for 4
package
Buy Now
Complete
CIO Establishment + Annual Reporting — £895 + VAT / annual cycle · New CIO establishment and continuing Charity Commission reporting coordination New CIO Establishment + Continuing Annual Reporting Coordination |
Incorporation can be important because it changes the legal position of an organisation.
An incorporated charitable body can have its own legal identity and operate in its own name, subject to the particular legal structure and regulatory framework that applies.
But incorporation is not an objective in isolation.
The important question is what you expect the incorporated organisation to enable you to do.
For example, you may expect the organisation to:
The significance of incorporation depends on the organisation you are establishing and the circumstances in which it will operate.
If you already believe that you need a CIO, SCIO or another particular structure, that is useful information. It is not, however, a substitute for understanding the organisation itself.
The professional task is to consider what you are trying to achieve and then determine which incorporated charitable route properly supports that objective.
A charitable organisation exists for a purpose, but that purpose also has to be understood in relation to the people or wider public it is intended to benefit.
Tell us, in ordinary terms, who you expect the organisation to help.
That might be a particular group of people, a community, people experiencing a particular disadvantage, the public more generally, or a combination of beneficiaries connected with the organisation's intended work.
You may already know the practical beneficiaries without knowing how their circumstances should be described for charitable or regulatory purposes. That distinction matters.
The professional task is not to ask you to convert your explanation into legal terminology.
Instead, the information about your intended beneficiaries is considered alongside the organisation's purposes and proposed activities.
This helps establish whether the proposed organisation is directed towards an appropriate charitable purpose and how the intended public benefit should be understood.
The answer may be straightforward. In other cases, the relationship between the proposed beneficiaries, the purpose and the activities may require closer consideration.
That is part of the professional interpretation rather than a decision you are expected to make simply by selecting an option.
A charitable organisation's activities are how its intended work is put into practice.
Explain what you expect the organisation actually to do.
You might be planning to provide services, deliver projects, organise activities, provide grants or assistance, educate or inform people, operate a community facility, support a particular group, preserve something of public value, or carry out another form of charitable work.
At this stage, practical language is useful.
You do not need to turn your activities into constitutional clauses.
The distinction matters because an organisation's purposes and its activities are related but are not necessarily the same thing. The purposes describe what the organisation exists to achieve; the activities describe how it intends to pursue those purposes.
Understanding both allows the professional route to consider whether the proposed governing framework properly supports the organisation's intended work.
It also helps identify circumstances where the practical operation of the organisation may require particular attention before its governing framework is established.
Before an appropriate incorporated charitable structure can be considered, it is necessary to understand where the organisation will be established, governed and expected to operate.
The jurisdiction is not a legal product for you to select. It is one of the circumstances from which the appropriate professional route follows.
For example, an organisation intended to be established in England and Wales may be capable of using a CIO, with the relevant charitable registration and incorporation process administered by the Charity Commission for England and Wales. A CIO is a distinct incorporated charitable form and is not incorporated through Companies House.
An organisation intended to be established in Scotland may instead fall within the Scottish charitable framework, where a SCIO is a distinct Scottish incorporated legal form regulated by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR).
Northern Ireland operates under its own charity-law and regulatory framework. It should therefore not be assumed that an England and Wales CIO or Scottish SCIO route simply carries across into Northern Ireland. Where an incorporated charity is appropriate in Northern Ireland, it will commonly or usually use a company limited by guarantee, subject to the organisation's particular circumstances and the appropriate professional and regulatory route.
The important point is that these jurisdictional differences do not require you to diagnose the legal structure.
You need to explain the organisation's intended circumstances: where it will be based, where it will be governed and where it expects to carry out its activities. Where activities extend beyond one jurisdiction, that fact should also be understood as part of the organisation's circumstances.
From those facts, Coddan can consider which jurisdictional framework applies and identify the appropriate professional route, legal or regulatory instrument and governance arrangements within the agreed scope.
The professional route therefore develops from the organisation itself:
The organisation remains the destination. The legal structure is the instrument used to establish it appropriately within its jurisdiction.
Only after the organisation and its circumstances have been understood does the appropriate incorporated charitable structure properly come into view.
For an organisation based in England and Wales, this may lead to a CIO.
For an organisation based in Scotland, it may lead to a SCIO.
For an organisation connected with Northern Ireland, the appropriate route must be established against the Northern Ireland legal and regulatory position rather than assuming that England-and-Wales CIO machinery applies.
The important point is that the structure follows the organisation.
A CIO or SCIO is not something you need to select simply because it appears to be the most familiar charitable structure. The appropriate instrument depends on the accumulated facts: what the organisation is intended to achieve, who it is intended to benefit, what it will do, who will govern it, how participation is intended to work and where it is established.
This is also why a simple comparison between legal forms cannot replace professional consideration of the organisation itself.
The objective is not to find the most elaborate structure.
It is to establish the organisation through the appropriate incorporated charitable form for its circumstances.
The charitable basis of the organisation needs to be coherent before the governing framework and registration route can properly be established.
You may describe the organisation in practical terms:
“We want to help people in this situation.”
“We want to provide this service to this community.”
“We want to advance this area of education, culture, health or community development.”
That explanation is valuable.
It is then necessary to consider what the organisation is legally being established to achieve, whether the purposes are charitable within the applicable jurisdiction and how those purposes are intended to provide public benefit.
For England and Wales, a CIO must have charitable purposes for the public benefit, and the Charity Commission considers charitable purposes and public benefit as part of the registration process.
Northern Ireland has its own statutory framework: an organisation must have one or more purposes falling within the relevant charitable purposes and must carry them out for public benefit.
Scotland likewise operates under its own Scottish charity law framework and regulatory test.
The important distinction is that you provide the underlying facts and intended outcomes.
Coddan's professional role is to consider those facts in the context of the applicable charitable framework rather than asking you to diagnose your own public-benefit position.
A charitable organisation needs people who will take responsibility for its governance.
Tell us who you expect to be involved in governing the organisation and, where known, how responsibility is intended to be shared.
You may already have a group of people who intend to act together. You may be bringing together people with different experience, knowledge or connections to the organisation's intended beneficiaries. You may still be identifying the appropriate governing people.
What matters at this stage is understanding the intended governing arrangement.
The professional work is then to consider the people involved against the requirements of the relevant legal structure and jurisdiction.
This can include considering the role of the trustees, how they will be appointed or removed, how responsibility is organised and whether the proposed arrangement is capable of supporting the organisation's intended governance.
You do not need to design trustee powers or constitutional machinery yourself.
Those matters belong within the governing framework that is constructed for the organisation.
Not every charitable organisation has the same relationship between its trustees, members and wider community.
The question is therefore not simply whether you want "members".
The more useful question is what participation is intended to mean for this organisation.
Will a defined group of people have a formal role in the organisation? Will membership represent the people who have established or support the organisation? Will the wider community participate in some meaningful way? Or is the organisation intended to operate with a more limited governing body?
Explain what you want participation to achieve.
The appropriate membership arrangements can then be considered in the context of the legal structure and governance model.
This is particularly important because membership arrangements differ between legal forms and jurisdictions.
You do not need to know the constitutional terminology in advance. The purpose of this stage is to establish the intended relationship between people and the organisation so that the appropriate governing framework can be constructed around it.
The way an organisation is governed should reflect what the organisation actually is.
For an England-and-Wales CIO, the information gathered about the organisation, trustees, intended membership and governance circumstances may lead to consideration of whether a Foundation CIO or Association CIO model is appropriate.
That distinction should not be treated as a starting choice.
It becomes meaningful after the organisation and its governing relationships have been understood.
Foundation CIO — the trustees are also the only voting members of the organisation.
Association CIO — the organisation has a wider voting membership in addition to its trustees.
The distinction is mainly about the relationship between the charity trustees and the voting membership. The governing document then sets out the detailed constitutional arrangements, including how trustees and members are appointed and how decisions are made.
| Question / feature | Foundation CIO | Association CIO |
|---|---|---|
| Voting membership | The charity trustees are also the only voting members. | There is a wider voting membership in addition to the charity trustees. |
| Governance emphasis | The trustee body and membership are the same group, so governance is centred on that combined relationship. | Trustees govern the CIO while the wider membership has its own constitutional role. |
| Typical organisational context | Can suit an organisation that does not need a wider voting membership. | Can suit an organisation intended to involve a broader voting membership. |
| Key structural question | Do the trustees-only membership arrangements reflect how this organisation should be governed? | Does the organisation genuinely need a wider voting membership and the constitutional role that goes with it? |
The distinction therefore reflects the intended relationship between trustees and members. The appropriate model depends on the organisation's circumstances and intended governance rather than on which description sounds preferable.
This Foundation/Association distinction belongs specifically to the England-and-Wales CIO framework. It should not be transferred into other UK charitable structures.
Scotland requires its own SCIO governance framework rather than Foundation/Association CIO terminology.
Northern Ireland likewise requires its own jurisdiction-specific governance treatment.
The objective is not to make you choose a governance model from a menu.
The objective is to understand how the organisation is intended to work and then construct governance arrangements that properly support that reality.
Every incorporated charitable organisation needs an appropriate governing framework.
The name and form of the governing document depend on the legal structure and jurisdiction through which the organisation is established.
For an England-and-Wales CIO, the constitution provides the framework through which the CIO's purposes, membership and governance are expressed. The Charity Commission provides different model constitutions for Foundation and Association CIOs, but the appropriate constitutional form follows from the governance model established for the organisation rather than being a document for the you to select at the beginning.
For a Scottish SCIO, the organisation requires a governing document appropriate to the Scottish legal form. The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) describes a charity's governing document as the written statement setting out its purpose, structure and how it will operate, including matters such as control, powers and membership.
Northern Ireland likewise requires a governing document appropriate to the organisation's legal structure. Where an incorporated Northern Ireland charity uses a company limited by guarantee, its constitutional framework follows that corporate structure and the applicable Northern Ireland charity and company-law requirements. It should not simply be given a CIO or SCIO constitution because those documents belong to different legal forms and jurisdictions.
The important point is that the governing document is not the destination.
It is the instrument through which the organisation's intended purposes, people, participation and governance are given a coherent legal framework.
That means the governing document should follow the organisation and the governance model already established for it, rather than the organisation being forced into a document simply because that document is available.
Where a standard framework properly fits, it should not be made unnecessarily complicated. Where the organisation's circumstances genuinely require particular treatment, that should be addressed professionally.
Some organisations are straightforward to establish.
Others contain circumstances that deserve closer professional attention before the governing framework or registration route is settled.
This does not mean that you needs to identify the legal problem or decide what special treatment is required. The useful starting point is simply to explain any circumstance that appears unusual, important or different from the organisation's ordinary intended operation.
This might arise because:
Those circumstances can then be considered together with the organisation's purposes, beneficiaries, activities, jurisdiction, trustees, membership and intended governance.
The presence of an unusual circumstance does not automatically mean that the organisation needs a complicated structure, bespoke constitutional treatment or additional professional services.
Equally, a circumstance that appears minor may sometimes have a genuine effect on the appropriate structure, governing framework or regulatory route. Its significance should therefore be determined professionally rather than assumed by the you.
The purpose of this stage is to ensure that anything genuinely material is recognised before the organisation's professional establishment route is brought together.
Where nothing requires particular treatment, that is also a legitimate professional outcome. The organisation should not be made more complicated simply because a more complicated solution is available.
By this stage, the organisation should be understood as a whole.
The relevant information is no longer a collection of separate answers.
It is the combined picture of:
This is where professional interpretation becomes decisive.
You provide the reality of the organisation: its intended purposes, beneficiaries, activities, people, participation, operating circumstances and intended outcomes.
You are not required to convert those facts into a legal structure, governance model or regulatory route.
Coddan considers those facts together and determines the appropriate establishment route, governing framework and regulatory treatment for the organisation and its jurisdiction.
The result should be coherent.
The structure should fit the organisation.
The governing framework should support the way the organisation is intended to operate.
The regulatory application should reflect the organisation that has actually been established in principle.
And the establishment route should follow from that professional understanding.
This is not a score, a test or a legal diagnosis that you has to perform.
It is the point at which the organisation's circumstances have been brought together sufficiently for the appropriate professional route to be established and put into effect.
The value of professional establishment support is not simply the existence of an application form. It is the work required to turn the organisation's information into a coherent registration route within the agreed scope.
You remain responsible for the factual information, decisions and approvals that belong to the organisation. Coddan's role is to review the information supplied, prepare the agreed materials, identify matters that need your decision, coordinate the agreed process and provide the resulting documents or registration outcome.
Coddan considers the information you provide about purposes, beneficiaries, activities, trustees, membership, jurisdiction and intended governance, and identifies the establishment route that fits the circumstances within the agreed scope.
Coddan prepares or coordinates the agreed governing, registration and supporting material so that the proposed organisation is presented consistently with the route being pursued.
Coddan coordinates the applicable professional submission and responds to process requirements within the agreed scope. Where the regulator asks for clarification or further information, the next step is identified with you.
The practical result is the relevant registration evidence and agreed establishment documentation, together with clarity about any remaining action that still belongs to the organisation or its trustees.
You receive the professional work and agreed outputs needed to move the organisation from an initial concept or established requirement towards its applicable incorporated-charity registration route. The exact deliverables depend on the scope agreed for the organisation.
This can include reviewed organisational information, prepared establishment material, a coherent governing-document route, coordinated registration work, and regulator correspondence handled within scope. Where further information or a decision is required from you, that requirement is identified rather than silently assumed.
The practical result is the relevant registration evidence or agreed documents once the process reaches its applicable outcome, together with clarity about any remaining action that belongs to the organisation or its trustees.
You and the trustees remain responsible for the organisation's decisions, the accuracy of information supplied, required approvals and the ongoing governance of the charity. Professional support does not transfer those responsibilities to Coddan, and regulator registration remains subject to the relevant regulator's independent requirements and decision.
Where the organisation is not straightforward, a written scope can be requested so that the agreed work, required information, customer decisions and intended outputs are clear before the professional work proceeds.
Once the organisation, jurisdiction, governing framework and appropriate incorporated charitable structure have been established, the registration process can proceed.
The route depends on the jurisdiction and legal form.
A CIO is established by registration with the Charity Commission for England and Wales rather than by incorporation through Companies House. A CIO must register with the Charity Commission regardless of its income.
The registration process considers matters including the charity's purposes, public benefit, governing document and trustees.
An England-and-Wales CIO is established by registration with the Charity Commission rather than by incorporation through Companies House. The Companies House identity-verification regime should therefore not be treated as the standard identity-verification route for a CIO's Charity Commission registration.
Where an individual separately has a Companies House identity-verification requirement, an ACSP may be able to verify that individual's identity for Companies House. That is a separate Companies House process and does not replace the requirements of the Charity Commission application.
Coddan's ACSP status is therefore relevant to applicable Companies House work, not a universal requirement for CIO registration.
A SCIO follows the Scottish regulatory route through OSCR. The SCIO is a distinct incorporated Scottish charity form, with its own governing document and regulatory framework.
Northern Ireland follows a separate charity-law and regulatory framework. Where an incorporated charity is appropriate, it will commonly or usually take the form of a company limited by guarantee. The company's corporate incorporation and the charity's regulatory registration are distinct aspects of establishing the organisation and must be addressed through the appropriate mechanisms for the organisation's circumstances. Coddan's role at this stage is to coordinate the appropriate professional and regulatory process rather than requiring you to select or complete those routes themselves.
Coddan's role at this stage is not simply to press a submission button.
The professional work depends upon the preceding work being coherent: the organisation, purposes, people, governance, governing document and jurisdiction must align with the route being pursued.
Where the relevant regulator requires further information or clarification, that becomes part of the professional registration process.
Registration is the event that brings the established framework into legal and regulatory effect.
It is not the final destination.
Successful registration changes the organisation's position.
The organisation is no longer simply something being planned.
It now exists within the legal and regulatory framework applicable to its incorporated charitable form.
For a CIO, this means the organisation has been registered as a CIO with the Charity Commission for England and Wales. For a SCIO, it means the organisation exists as the Scottish incorporated charitable form registered through OSCR.
In Northern Ireland, where an incorporated charity is appropriate, the organisation may be established through the relevant corporate structure, commonly a company limited by guarantee, with charity registration being a separate regulatory matter. Once the relevant establishment and regulatory requirements have been completed, the organisation exists in the appropriate legal and charitable framework for its intended life.
The registration number, certificate, register entry or equivalent evidence is important because it demonstrates that the relevant registration event has occurred.
But that evidence is not what the organisation was established to achieve.
The real outcome is the existence of the incorporated charitable organisation itself: an organisation with its own purposes, governing framework, trustees and, where applicable, members, capable of beginning the work it was established to perform.
The next question is therefore practical.
Is the organisation ready to begin its intended life within the framework that has been established for it?
That may involve putting initial governance records and arrangements into effect, ensuring that the relevant people understand their roles, and making sure the organisation's practical operation is consistent with its governing framework.
The extent of that work depends on the organisation.
There is no automatic requirement to add more simply because additional support is available.
If the CIO already exists, it does not need to have been established by Coddan before Coddan can be instructed for an agreed secretarial or corporate-service task. The work can be scoped around the particular requirement, the information and authority supplied, the decisions or approvals needed, and the resulting document, record or filing outcome.
Depending on the organisation, the next practical work may include maintaining governance records, keeping trustee and membership information up to date where applicable, preparing information for annual Charity Commission reporting, recording trustee or member decisions, or dealing with later constitutional and organisational changes.
Coddan can provide continuing governance, secretarial and reporting support where that work is required and falls within the selected service scope. Trustees remain responsible for the CIO, its decisions and the accuracy of information supplied.
Continuing governance and secretarial work can be instructed separately where the organisation actually requires it.Establishing the organisation is not necessarily the end of the professional relationship.
But neither is it the beginning of an automatic list of additional services.
Once the incorporated charitable body exists, its immediate governance position can be considered.
Depending on the organisation and jurisdiction, this may involve matters such as:
The appropriate outcome will differ from one organisation to another.
Some organisations may benefit from continuing professional support.
Others may have a sufficiently straightforward governance position to proceed without additional support at that stage.
That distinction matters.
The availability of a service does not itself create a requirement for that service.
If the organisation is properly established and nothing further is presently required, that is a valid professional conclusion.
Where something does require attention, the appropriate next step should be identified from the organisation's actual circumstances rather than from a predetermined package of services.
Charitable establishment and regulatory registration do not, by themselves, resolve the organisation's tax position. Where applicable, registration or recognition with the relevant charity regulator is separate from HMRC recognition for tax purposes. HMRC recognition may be required in connection with charitable tax reliefs and Gift Aid, while Corporation Tax and VAT obligations or reliefs depend on the organisation's activities and circumstances. These matters therefore require separate consideration where relevant; they should not be assumed to follow automatically from incorporation or charity registration.
This does not mean that further tax work is automatically required. Where the organisation's circumstances do not presently require additional tax action, nothing further is presently required on that point.
If an overseas accountant, lawyer, adviser, formation agent or other professional partner is coordinating the establishment of a CIO for a client, Coddan can work from accepted instructions, the authority provided, the required organisational information and the approvals needed to complete the agreed work.
Accepted instructions, authority to act, accurate client information, supporting documents and any decisions or approvals that must come from the client or trustees.
Coddan reviews the instruction, prepares or coordinates the agreed work, communicates the next required decisions and provides the resulting documents or registration outcome within scope.
Coddan uses its own applicable accounts and credentials. Access to Coddan's Companies House or other professional credentials is not lent or transferred to an external partner.
For a defined professional-partner requirement, an international project quotation can be requested through the professional partner enquiry route.
No.
You can begin by explaining the organisation you are trying to establish, what it is intended to achieve, who it is intended to benefit, what it will do and where it will be established.
The appropriate incorporated charitable structure can then be considered in the context of those circumstances.
No.
A CIO is an incorporated charitable structure for England and Wales. It is registered with the Charity Commission rather than incorporated through Companies House.
That is different from establishing a charitable company.
No.
A SCIO is a distinct Scottish legal form for incorporated charities and is administered and regulated by OSCR.
The Scottish route therefore needs to be considered on its own terms.
That should not be necessary.
For an England-and-Wales CIO, the appropriate governance model should follow consideration of the organisation, its trustees, intended membership and governance circumstances.
The distinction is therefore part of the professional establishment process rather than a product choice at the entrance.
You need an appropriate governing document for the legal structure being established, but you do not need to begin by designing constitutional machinery yourself.
The governing document should express the organisation's purposes, structure and governance in a way appropriate to its legal form. For example, an England-and-Wales CIO uses a CIO constitution, while a SCIO uses a SCIO constitution.
No assumption should be made on that basis.
“Governance and secretarial support” describes a professional support function. It does not mean that every CIO or SCIO is required to appoint a statutory company secretary.
The support actually required depends on the organisation and its legal structure.
Yes, where the circumstances fall within the professional services being provided.
An unusual circumstance does not automatically mean that a complicated structure is required. The appropriate response depends on what the circumstance actually changes or requires.
The organisation's purposes, activities, beneficiaries and other circumstances need to be considered against the applicable charitable framework and regulator requirements.
You provide the factual explanation of what the organisation is intended to achieve. The professional task is to prepare and coordinate the appropriate establishment and regulatory route within the agreed scope.
The relevant charity regulator ultimately has its own statutory role in determining registration.
Charity registration and HMRC recognition are separate matters. Where applicable, registration or recognition with the relevant charity regulator does not by itself establish the organisation's HMRC tax-recognition position. HMRC recognition may be required in connection with charitable tax reliefs and Gift Aid, while other tax matters depend on the organisation's activities and circumstances.
No. Corporation Tax and VAT treatment depend on the organisation's activities and circumstances. Charitable status can provide particular tax reliefs, but these do not automatically apply to every activity or transaction. Where relevant, the organisation's tax position should therefore be considered separately from its establishment and charity registration.
The organisation begins its legal and operational life within the governing and regulatory framework that applies to it.
The immediate position can then be considered: governance records, trustee/member arrangements, regulatory responsibilities and any other matters genuinely relevant to the organisation.
Some organisations may need continuing professional support. Others may not.
No.
Continuing support should depend on the organisation's actual circumstances.
If the organisation is properly established and there is nothing further that presently requires professional attention, nothing further is presently required is a legitimate outcome.
An organisation may have activities or beneficiaries extending beyond the jurisdiction in which it is established, but that does not mean the establishment and regulatory rules become identical across the UK.
The jurisdiction in which the organisation is legally established and governed needs to be distinguished from the geographical reach of its activities.
Where more than one jurisdiction is materially involved, the circumstances should be considered before the establishment route is determined.
The registration number or certificate is evidence that the relevant registration event has occurred.
The substantive outcome is the properly established incorporated charitable organisation itself, with the appropriate governing framework and regulatory position.
The organisation — not the number — is the destination.
They can be considered where relevant, but they are separate professional matters.
HMRC's current guidance confirms that charity tax recognition has its own requirements and process.
The need for tax support should therefore arise from the organisation's actual circumstances rather than being assumed automatically.
That is precisely why the post-establishment position should be considered professionally.
The correct outcome may be that something requires attention.
It may equally be that the organisation is properly established and nothing further is presently required.
The purpose of professional support is to identify which is true for the organisation rather than to assume that every organisation needs the same continuing services.
Coddan CPM LTD™ Business One-Stop Shop since 2005 Doing Business Made Easier!
Send us an e-mail
